Criminal miscellaneous petition withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel after some arguments; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without recording any findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
XYZ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shikhar Singhal, Advocate
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
FEBRUARY 20, 2026/ bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:07:18
XYZ
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
