Petition under Article 227 challenging a revisional court order that did not extend an interim protection; counsel sought liberty to pursue other remedies and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
SOHAN LAL GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Mr. Dhruv Chauhan, Mr. Siddarth Gupta and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 20.02.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:07:30
submissions made by learned counsel, however after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition and take appropriate remedies/ recourse in accordance with law.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
FEBRUARY 20, 2026/ bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:07:30
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sohan Lal Gupta
State of NCT of Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
