Disposed¶17

Ms Xxxxx v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC28 Apr 2026W.P.(CRL)/1381/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court single-judge order (Justice Manoj Jain, 28.04.2026) in W.P.(CRL) 1381/2026: writ petition complaining of non-registration of FIR on petitioner's complaint withdrawn as not pressed; petitioner granted liberty to file afresh if police takes no action after she contacts the I.O.; pending applications CRL.M.A. 13246-13247/2026 disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal accepted as not pressed; liberty to file the petition afresh if no action is taken by the police; pending applications disposed of. ¶17

Ms Xxxxx Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~77

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1381/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13246-13247/2026 MS XXXXX

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akansha and Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

¶7

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate. SI Deepika.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 28.04.2026

¶9

The prime grievance coming from the side of the petitioner is to the effect that the police has yet not registered FIR based on her complaint.

¶10

The concerned I.O. is present and she submits that they wanted some further assistance from the complainant, in order to take appropriate action in the matter, but since despite being contacted, she did not come forward and and her complaint was, eventually, filed.

¶11

During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner assured that the petitioner would contact the concerned I.O. within one week. She also submits that in case she apprehends any threat to her life at the hands of the concerned accused, the police should assure that requisite action is taken.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 1381/2026 1

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 13:12:02

¶15

Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl) for the State submits that all the necessary action will be taken, once she contacts the investigating officer.

¶16

In view of the above, at the moment, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and seeks to withdraw the same. She, however, seeks liberty to file it afresh, if no action is taken by the police.

¶17

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.

¶18

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶19

Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

APRIL 28, 2026/ss/pb

¶22

W.P.(CRL) 1381/2026 2

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 13:12:02

Ms Xxxxx v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Xxxxx v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sunil Goel Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Mahender Sharma Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Niranjan Mahalik Vs State NCT of Delhi

Suraj Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sazid Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sandeep Alias Sandy Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anrl.

Vicky @ Gobind Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Sunita Shiv Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ayush Govil and Others Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ilyas @ Hafiz Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Hans Raj Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Vipin Pathak Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.