Vipin Pathak v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court bail application BAIL APPLN. 454/2026, Vipin Pathak v. State of NCT of Delhi, Justice Manoj Jain, 28.04.2026: non-supply of CCTV footage to accused at trial stage; DVR with FSL for forensic analysis; Director FSL directed to expedite examination; applicant in custody ~1.5 years; trial delayed for want of electronic evidence; application disposed of as not pressed with liberty to revive; rights and contentions left open; order copied to Trial Court and via IO dasti to Director FSL.
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file afresh at a subsequent stage; Director, FSL directed to expedite forensic examination; copy of the order sent to the Trial Court and, dasti, to the IO for placing before the Director, FSL; all rights and contentions left open. ¶6