The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the underlying criminal writ petition, with liberty to pursue any other remedies available in law, and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
W.P.(CRL) 1316/2026 was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any other remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~104
CNR No. DLHC010172882026
CRL.M.A. 29391/2026 IN
PARESH LAVJIBHAI MEHTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Bhavya Sethi, Mr. Gaurava Sharma and Ms. Apurva Ambasth, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ishkaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Yadav and Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Advocates for UoI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 21.09.2026
CRL.M.A. 29391/2026
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:28:04
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the underlying writ petition with liberty to pursue other legally available remedies.
Paresh Lavjibhai Mehta
Union of India & Anr.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
