Mukul Ahlawat and Anr. v. the State Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus; police protection for newly married consenting adults; threats by father of wife (Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police); marriage dated 06.03.2026, registration 12.03.2026; Arya Samaj Vaidic Sanskar Trust; Article 226 Constitution of India; Sections 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Part III; Article 21; Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. (2018) 16 SCC 368; Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475; PS Baba Haridas Nagar; Head/Beat Constable Balram; SHO Ashu; three-day intimation to SHO on shifting residence; Delhi High Court; Justice Saurabh Banerjee; order dated 22.04.2026.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed and disposed of: petitioners, consenting adults who married of their own free will, given liberty to seek police protection/assistance as and when required; Head/Beat Constable (Mr. Balram) and SHO (Mr. Ashu), PS Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi, directed to take all possible steps to provide adequate assistance and protection in accordance with law; corresponding duty cast on the SHO of any other police station within whose jurisdiction the petitioners may shift, subject to intimation of complete details within three days.