Petitioner sought to challenge a freezing order under the NDPS Act. The respondent's counsel confirmed prior consideration by the competent authority. Petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal during hearing. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~96
versus
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Mr. Sahil Khurana, Ms. Anoushka Bhalla, Advs.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 21.04.2026
W.P.(CRL) 1264/2026 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:44:35
filed under Section 68(O) of the NDPS Act.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
APRIL 21, 2026 Tg/AD/
W.P.(CRL) 1264/2026 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:44:35
Sondutt Singh
Narcotics Control Bureau
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
