Disposed¶30

Ramesh Kaushik v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC21 Apr 2026W.P.(CRL)/1271/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026, Ramesh Kaushik v. State NCT of Delhi, Delhi High Court, 21.04.2026, Anup Jairam Bhambhani J.; Article 227 Constitution; section 528 BNSS 2023; section 156(3) Cr.P.C.; delay in deciding pre-FIR complaint application; direction to CJM Patiala House Courts for time-bound disposal within 03 months; FIR registration against persons connected with Multi-State Cooperative Society; multiple ATRs; 04-year pendency; order dated 14.03.2026 summoning Inspectors Vishal Chaudhary and Vijay Kumar through DCP.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned CJM to dispose of the petitioner's application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. as expeditiously as possible and in any event within 03 months from the next date of hearing before that court; pending applications, if any, also disposed of. ¶30

Ramesh Kaushik Vs State NCT of Delhi — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~56

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026 RAMESH KAUSHIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Bachawat, Advocate via video-conferencing.

¶4

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 21.04.2026

¶5

CRL.M.A. 12244/2026 (exemption)

¶6

Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions.

¶7

The application stands disposed-of.

¶8

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026

¶9

By way of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks a direction to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi to decide his application filed under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) bearing Ct. Cases No. 652/2022, in an expeditious and time-bound manner.

¶10

Mr. Alok Bachawat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that the petitioner had filed the application under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. on 09.04.2022 , which came to be listed before the learned CJM on first on 19.04.2022, when an Action Taken Report (‘ATR’) was called from the respondent (State).

¶11

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 13:23:09

¶15

Mr. Bachawat submits, that thereafter the matter has been heard at length on multiple occasions, but no decision has been taken thereon, though multiple ATRs have been called by the learned CJM, without culminating in any order.

¶16

Mr. Bachawat has drawn attention to the order-sheets of the matter spanning about 04 years, copies of which have been appended to the petition.

¶17

Mr. Bachawat has also drawn attention to an order dated 14.03.2026, to point-out that in view of the unacceptable position obtaining in the matter, by the said order the learned CJM had directed as follows:

¶18

“ It is stated by the IO that he has since been transferred and

¶19

the present holding IO is Inspector Vishal Chaudhary. It is further stated that the inquiry was initially conducted by Inspector Vijay Kumar and he had filed the inquiry report initially. Accordingly, both Inspector Vishal Chaudhary and Inspector Vijay Kumar be summoned through DCP concerned for NDOH.

¶20

“ Ld. Counsel for Union of India also states that authorised representative shall remain present in Court on NDOH to assist with regard to role of Multi State Cooperative Society, 2002 and office of Central Registrar. ”

¶21

(emphasis supplied)

¶22

Counsel submits, that the petitioner is seeking registration of an FIR against certain persons in relation to the affairs of a Multi-State Cooperative Society.

¶23

Issue notice.

¶24

Learned ASC (Criminal) appears on behalf of the State on advance copy; accepts notice; and leaves it to the court to pass appropriate orders.

¶25

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 13:23:09

¶29

Considering the submissions made, which are borne-out from the record, and in particular the fact that an application under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. has been pending for about 04 years , the present petition is disposed-of, with a direction to the learned CJM to disposeof the application filed under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. as expeditiously as possible and in any event within 03 months from the next date of hearing before that court.

¶30

The petition is disposed-of in the above terms.

¶31

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶32

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶33

APRIL 21, 2026 V.Rawat

¶34

W.P.(CRL) 1271/2026

¶35

Page 3 of 3

¶36

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2026 at 13:23:09

Ramesh Kaushik v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kaushik v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. John Daniel Vs Union of India & Ors.

Manju Nigam Vs the State Gnct of Delhi & Ors.

Rahul @ Puneet Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Shailender Aggarwal Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Azeem Khan Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Shamim Bano Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Avinash Kaur Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Rakesh Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rahul @ Puneet Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Cannon Industries Private Limited and Ors. Vs Hazoorilal and Sons Jewellers Private Limited

Surinder Kumar Vs State (Govt of Nct) Delhi

Tasleem Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sunil@ Lilly Vs State (Nct of Delhi)