grounds for the enforcement of Section 30 in this context, rendering the order impugned in the original writ devoid of legal validity. For those reasons, in the opinion of the Court, it was within the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge to rely on Section 24 of EPH Act, which is the deeming provision " 24. Coming into force of scheme-(1) As soon as the persons entitled to possession of holdings under this Act have entered into possession of the holdings, respectively allotted to them the scheme shall be deemed to have come into force and the possession of the allottees affected by the scheme of consolidation, or as the case may be by repartition, shall remain undisturbed until a fresh scheme is brought into force or a change is ordered in pursuance of provisions of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of section 21 or an order passed under section 36 or 42 of this Act. (2) A Consolidation officer shall be competent to exercise all or any of the powers of a Revenue Officer under the Punjab Land Revenue Act. 1887 (Act XVII of 1887), for purposes of compliance with the provisions of subsection (1)." 17. In light of the aforementioned analysis and taking into account the pivotal fact that the landowners were put into possession of their respective plots as a direct outcome of the implementation of the final consolidation scheme, it becomes imperative for the court to abstain from intervening in the view taken by the learned Single Judge. As outlined within the impugned Order, it is essential to underscore that, in the present scenario, the execution of sale deeds has already transpired in favour of the respondent ."
