M/S Emporium Steel v. Ms Chanchal Yadav & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case petition withdrawn by petitioner; court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
MS CHANCHAL YADAV & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. K. G. Gopalkrishnan, Mr. Girish Kaul and Ms. Aishwarya Singh Rana, Advocates.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition; the same is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
SACHIN DATTA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2026 at 12:05:15
M/S Emporium Steel
Ms Chanchal Yadav
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court