Ishwar Singh Yadav v. Govind Mohan & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners alleged non-compliance with earlier orders directing grant of second ACP benefits, contending they were upgraded to the post of ASI, which did not exist on the relevant date, instead of the next higher grade of Sub-Inspector per the ACP Scheme's existing hierarchy requirement. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the Office Order dated 30.06.2025, hear the petitioners, and
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to re-consider/re-visit Office Order dated 30.06.2025, give petitioners a hearing, and pass orders within 4 weeks; liberty to revive petitions or avail other remedies.