Petitioner in a contempt case sought withdrawal, stating his grievance had been redressed. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
MANOHAR SINGH KANYAL .....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
RAHUL NAVIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel, ED with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel counsel, Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr. Yash Jangid, Advocates for respondent/ED. (M): 8802918860 Email: [email protected]
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JULY 6, 2026 c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2026 at 11:13:52
Manohar Singh Kanyal
Rahul Navin
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
