Petition under Article 227 sought framing of an additional issue on limitation, the written statement having raised a preliminary objection that the suit was time-barred. The court framed additional Issue No. 7A on limitation and disposed of the petition and pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
versus
AMIT AGARWAL .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sidhant Kapur and Ms. Kaveri Kapur, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
ORDER (Oral)
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 859/2026
Page 1 of 2
Signed By:VAISHALI CHAUHAN Signing Da te:2 2.04.2026 11:47:14
Issue No. 7A: Whether the suit is barred by period of limitation, as alleged by the defendant in his written statement. OPD.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 21, 2026/ nd/tp
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:VAISHALI CM(M) 859/2026 CHAUHAN Signing Da te:2 2.04.2026 11:47:14
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an additional issue on limitation should be framed in the suit given the defendant's preliminary objection that it is barred by limitation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAMESH TIWARI
AMIT AGARWAL
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
