Dismissed¶19

Urvashi Yadav v. Siddharth Kumar

Delhi HC8 Apr 2026CM(M)/3781/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CM(M) 3781/2024; Delhi High Court; Justice Amit Sharma; decided 08.04.2026; petitioner Urvashi Yadav; respondent Siddharth Kumar; Article 227 Constitution of India; child custody; Family Judge South West District Dwarka Courts; impugned order 04.10.2024; full day custody every 2nd Saturday uptil succeeding Sunday; children kept in Delhi at grandparents' house; settlement between parties; petition withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of; pending applications, if any, disposed of. No adjudication on merits. ¶19

Urvashi Yadav Vs Siddharth Kumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~15

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CM(M) 3781/2024 & CM APPL. 65166/2024

¶4

URVASHI YADAV .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Gaurav Chauhan, Mr. Vishal Chauhan, Ms. Shivya Sharma, Mr. Ramesh Pandey and Ms. Priyanka Bakshi, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

SIDDHARTH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Anand and Mr. Ankur Saini, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 08.04.2026

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeks the following prayers: -

¶13

“(i) Allow the present Petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the Impugned Order dated 04.10.2024 in part .

¶14

(ii) Set Aside the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Ld. Family Judge, South West District, Dwarka Courts to the extent of granting full day custody to Respondent on every 2nd Saturday uptil succeeding Sunday, where, the children shall be kept in Delhi to their grandparents house.

¶15

AND/OR Pass any other order(s) or relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioners and against the Respondent in the interest of justice.”

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 11:12:36

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled with the respondent, and thus, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

¶19

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶20

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶21

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith .

¶22

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶23

APRIL 8, 2026 dy

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 11:12:36

Urvashi Yadav v. Siddharth Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urvashi Yadav v. Siddharth Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhudev Sharma & Ors. Vs Gauri Shankar & Ors.

M/S Gupta and Co. Vs DDA

Atul Goel Vs Shashi Bala

Pandit D K Parsai & Anr. Vs Dr. Satish Chandar Agarwal & Ors.

Dipaali Sharrma Vs Ameet Sharrma

Akhilesh Vedhera Vs Shikha Arora

Satyanarayan Camma Vs Rahul Passi & Ors.

Brijesh Kumar Vs the Jyoti Raw Phooley Co. Operative Urban Thrift and Credit Society Ltd.

Suresh Khandelwal Vs Anurag Gupta HUF

Harbhajan Singh Vs Arvind Singh

Satvir & Anr. Vs Surender Singh

Aravali Hydro Power Project Vs Ms Thakur

Ranjit Singh Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Satish Kumar Gupta Vs Kamla Devi