After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court permitted withdrawal, disposing of the petition as withdrawn along with the pending applications. No substantive issue was decided.
Leave to withdraw granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
Through: Ms. Apurva Singh, Ms. Divya Rastogi, Mr. Shivang Srivastava and Mr. Rishi Rai, Advocates.
versus
RAMESH CHANDER CHADHA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 16.02.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2026/ nd/abk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 11:55:47
SARIKA KHANNA & ANR.
RAMESH CHANDER CHADHA
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
