Disposed¶18

Alc Food Pvt. Ltd. v. Ymc India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC17 Feb 2026CM(M)/1878/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, CM(M) 1878/2025, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta J., Article 227 Constitution of India, closure of cross-examination of witness reversed by consent, one more opportunity to cross-examine PW-1 AR of plaintiff, CS (COMM) No. 336/2024, order dated 16.09.2025 trial court, cross-examination fixed for 27.02.2026, petition and applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted one more opportunity to cross-examine PW-1 (AR of the respondent/plaintiff); trial court permitted to conduct it on the already-fixed date of 27th February, 2026 or any other convenient date; pending applications also disposed of. ¶18

Alc Food Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ymc India Pvt. Ltd. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~43

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17^th February, 2026

¶3

- CM(M) 1878/2025, CM APPL. 60199/2025, CM APPL. 60200/2025 & CM APPL. 81793/2025

¶4

ALC FOOD PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Tej Pratap and Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

YMC INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhay Mani Tripathi, Advocate through VC.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral)

¶10

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

¶11

This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the impugned order dated 16^th September, 2025, passed by the learned trial court in CS (COMM) No. 336/2024, whereby the further cross-examination of the PW-1 (AR of the respondent/plaintiff), to be conducted by the petitioner, has been closed. 3. Heard. Record perused.

¶13

Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objections if the petitioner is granted one more opportunity to cross-examine the PW-1, provided the same is conducted expeditiously, so as to avoid any further delay in proceedings of the case.

¶14

Signature Not Verified

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

CM(M) 1878/2025

¶17

Signed By:MANISHA RAJPUT Signing Da te:1 8.02.2026 12:04:36

¶18

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned Counsel for the parties, the petitioner is granted one more opportunity to cross-examine the PW-1. It shall be open to the learned trial court to permit the cross-examination of the PW-1 on the date already fixed, i.e., 27^th February, 2026, or on any other date as may be convenient to the learned trial court. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above-stated terms. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶19

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 17, 2026/ MR/ik

¶21

Signature Not Verified

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

CM(M) 1878/2025

¶24

Signed By:MANISHA RAJPUT Signing Da te:1 8.02.2026 12:04:36

Alc Food Pvt. Ltd. v. Ymc India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alc Food Pvt. Ltd. v. Ymc India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Talwar Vs Nishi Rastogi

Sh Hardut Vs Smt Shashi & Ors.

Sunder Kishan Khanna Vs Ashok Kumar Mittal & Ors.

Sarika Khanna & Anr. Vs Ramesh Chander Chadha

A. Anand Vs Aruna

Rekha and Anr. & Anr. Vs Parul Taneja & Anr.

Kaushalya Devi Vs Ms Praveena Arora & Anr.

Vijay Suresh Gupta Vs Atrica Tradex Private Limited & Anr.

Deepak Talwar Vs Nishi Rastogi

Sunder Kishan Khanna Vs Ashok Kumar Mittal & Ors.

Sarika Khanna & Anr. Vs Ramesh Chander Chadha

Archana Mohan Vs Anju Bala & Anr.

Shri Shyam Tandon Vs Mr. Mohd. Haroon Japanwala & Ors.

Eminence Townships India Private Limited Vs Sushil Aggarwal and Anr.