The High Court Delhi disposed of a petition seeking to set aside a trial court order in a CS/Injunction matter, directing the trial court to dispose of the underlying Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 application on a fixed date, finding nothing survived. The petition was finally disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
CNR No. DLHC010418832026
SHAVETA HANDA AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Karuna Chhatwal, Adv.
versus
GAGANJIT SINGH
.....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 07.09.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:24:42
with respect to the suit premises.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
SEPTEMBER 7, 2026/ ar/sg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:24:42
SHAVETA HANDA AND ORS
GAGANJIT SINGH
AJAY DIGPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
