Aditya Pandey v. Aarti Kumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Article 227 petition; CM(M) 1768/2025; expediting matrimonial proceedings; Family Court Dwarka; H.M.A no. 1551/2024; Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)(ib); Section 5 Limitation Act delay condonation; 90 days refilling; Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment verification clause; mediation alternative; disposal without specific directions; request to Trial Court for expedition. Relevance: illustrates Delhi High Court practice of declining fixed timelines for Family Court proceedings when issues are framed and the matter is progressing towards evidence, granting only a general expedition request.
What did the court decide?
Delay condonation application allowed and 90 days' delay in refilling condoned; Article 227 petition disposed of without specific directions, with a request to the Trial Court to proceed expeditiously without undue adjournments and a copy of the order sent to the Trial Court.