Petition under Article 227 challenged a Family Court order in a matrimonial case regarding cross-examination and evidence deadlines. After the petitioner withdrew one witness affidavit, parties gave undertakings to conclude cross-examination within twenty hearings; the petition was disposed of accordingly without deciding the challenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
GAURAV BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Dr. T.R. Naval, Mr. Puneet Goel, Mr. Aakash Naval, Mr. Sahanawaz, Mr. Abhishek Naval, Mr. Musheer Khan and Mr. Hardik Singh, Advocates.
versus
SHIVI BANSAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Kashish Vats, Mr. Surendra Singh, Mr. Sonu Kumar, Mr. Krishna Shukla, Mr. Akash Gahlot, Mr. Swapnil Dubey, Ms. Shivani Singh and Mr. Mukesh Hooda, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 07.07.2026
“It is, therefore, under the facts and circumstances as stated above, this Hon'ble Court may please to allow the present petition, thereby set aside the order dated11.04.2026,passed by Sh. Manish Khurana, Ld. Judge Family Court, District East, Karkardooma Court, in HMA No.1041/2026 title as Gaurav Bansal vs Shivi Bansal and as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:15:01
accordingly close the right of the respondent to cross examine the petitioner and his witnesses and further close the right of the respondent to lead her examination, in the interest of justice.”
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
JULY 07, 2026/tk/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:15:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order closing the petitioner's right to lead evidence could be interfered with under Article 227.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaurav Bansal
Shivi Bansal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
