Petition under CM(M) was sought to be withdrawn as the main suit stood decreed and nothing survived. The court dismissed the petition, along with pending applications, as withdrawn on the ground of being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
KSHITIZ PRAKASH .....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given
versus
BRIJ BHUSHAN ATTRI .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 08.07.2026
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
JULY 8, 2026/ ar/as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:19:02
Kshitiz Prakash
Brij Bhushan Attri
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
