Disposed
Vandana v. Jitesh Kumar
Delhi HCCM(M)/1176/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition under Article 227 challenging a Family Court order appointing a Local Commissioner in a divorce matter was withdrawn; the High Court dismissed it and requested the Local Commissioner to fix cross-examination dates from early July.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~61
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 1176/2026 & CM APPL. 34073/2026(stay)
¶4
- VANDANA .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Ms. Jyoti Gupta, Adv. with petitioner in-person.
¶6
versus
¶7
JITESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Seema Seth, Mr. Sourav Kuma, Advs. with the respondent in-person.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 19.05.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
¶12
CM APPL. 34074/2026 (Exemption)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vandana
- respondent
Jitesh Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Amit Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court