Writ petition under Article 227 challenging a Family Court order in a matrimonial case was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue permissible remedies; the petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to avail remedies as permissible in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
AMRIT ANJAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Mr. Satyam Parashar and Mr. Santosh Kumar Yadav, Advocates.
versus
AKRITI AJAY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vipul Tiwari, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 13.07.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:16:53
Application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. JULY 13, 2026/nd/dj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:16:53
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amrit Anjay
Akriti Ajay
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
