Kamal Prakash v. State NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Two bail applications were listed; earlier counsel were discharged and new counsel sought withdrawal of the applications after some arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12 & 13
KAMAL PRAKASH .....Applicant Through: Mr. Prakash Kashyap and Mr. Ashish Sareen, Advs.
versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates
13
BAIL APPLN. 899/2026, CRL.M.(BAIL) 468/2026 RADHA PRAKASH .....Applicant Through: Mr. Prakash Kashyap and Mr. Ashish Sareen, Advs.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 02.04.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:36:01
wishes to withdraw the earlier vakalatnama filed by her as the applicant has engaged a new counsel.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
APRIL 2, 2026/ bh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:36:01
Kamal Prakash
Radha Prakash
State NCT of Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court