Dismissed¶17

Mayank Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC25 Apr 2026BAIL APPLN./3504/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

BAIL APPLN. 3504/2024 & CRL.M.A. 12945/2026, High Court of Delhi, decided 25.04.2026 by Girish Kathpalia, J. Petitioner Mayank Pandey (through Alabhya Dhamija, Adv.) sought bail in FIR No. 411/2024, PS Mukherji Nagar, under Sections 420/406/467/468/471/120B IPC; State of NCT of Delhi represented by APP Amit Ahlawat, complainant de facto by Kapil Malik, Adv. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh before the trial court citing change in circumstances; application and pending application dismissed as withdrawn. Keywords: anticipatory bail, withdrawal, liberty to file afresh, change in circumstances, old pendency, transferred applications.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application and pending application dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh before the trial court. ¶17

Mayank Pandey Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 3504/2024 & CRL.M.A. 12945/2026 MAYANK PANDEY .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Advocate ( E.No. D/2834/2017 )

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State Mr. Kapil Malik, Advocate for complainant de facto.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R

¶9

% 25.04.2026

¶10

File taken up today on account of 03.03.2026 being declared holiday.

¶11

The accused/applicant seeks bail in case FIR No. 411/2024 of PS Mukherji Nagar for offence under Section 420/406/467/468/471/120B IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available and parties are trying to settle the disputes. Keeping in mind the extreme old pendency of this bail application, which formed part of 179 such old applications transferred from different benches to this bench, there is no scope for any adjournment. On this, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks a passover to ask the arguing counsel to appear through videoconferencing. 3. As requested, be awaited.

¶13

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶14

APRIL 25, 2026/ as

¶15

In this second call, learned counsel for accused/applicant has appeared with instructions from the accused/applicant and seeks permission to

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:18:30

¶17

withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court since according to him, there is change in circumstances. 5. As requested, the anticipatory bail application and pending application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

¶18

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶19

APRIL 25, 2026/ ry

¶20

Mayank Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayank Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Mithas Vs State & Anr.

Najim Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sarika@Radha@Lovanya T. Vs State NCT of Delhi

Bhagat Singh Vs Nikhil Aggarwal

Subash Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Bhagat Singh Vs Nikhil Aggarwal