Dismissed¶7

Subash v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC25 Apr 2026BAIL APPLN./1073/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC order 25.04.2026, BAIL APPLN. 1073/2025 (Girish Kathpalia, J): regular bail application in FIR 1029/2023 PS Samaipur Badli (Sections 376/354/354A IPC; Section 6 POCSO Act) dismissed as withdrawn at applicant's request; adjournment refused citing old pendency among 179 transferred applications; false statement at bar by counsel recorded.

What did the court decide?

As requested by learned counsel for the accused/applicant, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶7

Subash Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 1073/2025 SUBASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Chauhan, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with W/SI Priyanka and W/SI Rinki, PS S. P. Badli. Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate for Complainant.

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶6

O R D E R % 25.04.2026 File taken up today on account of 03.03.2026 being declared holiday.

¶7

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 1029/2023 of PS Samaipur Badli for offence under Section 376/354/354A IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act.

¶8

Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks adjournment on the ground that arguing senior counsel, Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey is unwell. Keeping in mind the extreme old pendency of this bail application, which formed part of 179 such old applications transferred from different benches to this bench, there is no scope for any adjournment. On this, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks a passover to ask the arguing senior counsel, Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey to appear through videoconferencing.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:18:17

¶10

As requested, be awaited.

¶11

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶12

APRIL 25, 2026/as

¶13

Present: Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Senior Advocate for accused/applicant ( through videoconferencing ) with Mr. Tarun Chauhan, Advocate.

¶14

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with W/SI Priyanka and W/SI Rinki, PS S. P. Badli.

¶15

Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate for Complainant.

¶16

In the midst of the board, the matter has been taken up on being mentioned by Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Senior Advocate, who has appeared through videoconferencing to submit that he is completely hale and hearty and that it is the briefing counsel, present in court who had specifically instructed the senior advocate not to appear today.

¶17

It is extremely unfortunate that a false statement was made at bar. Learned counsel for accused/applicant expresses apology.

¶18

Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.

¶19

As requested, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶21

APRIL 25, 2026/ dr

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:18:17

Subash v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subash v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Mithas Vs State & Anr.

Najim Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sarika@Radha@Lovanya T. Vs State NCT of Delhi

Mayank Pandey Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Bhagat Singh Vs Nikhil Aggarwal

Bhagat Singh Vs Nikhil Aggarwal