Allowed¶5

Mukul @ Puneet v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC3 Jul 2026BAIL APPLN./2419/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court bail application allowed (03.07.2026) for Mukul @ Puneet, FIR No. 357/2024, PS Sagarpur, Section 307/34 IPC; stab injury on victim Subhit witnessed by complainant de facto Suraj; injured witness examined at trial stage; State no objection; parity with co-accused Vimal bailed 02.04.2026; custody since 30.05.2024; personal bond Rs.10,000 plus one surety; Bench: Girish Kathpalia; case refs: BAIL APPLN. 2419/2026, CRL.M.A. 18799/2026.

What did the court decide?

Release on regular bail subject to personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. ¶5

Mukul @ Puneet Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 03.07.2026

¶4

- BAIL APPLN. 2419/2026 & CRL.M.A. 18799/2026

¶5

MUKUL @ PUNEET .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Chetan, Advocate

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Nitesh Mahiya

¶9

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶10

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶11

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 357/2024 of PS Sagarpur for offence under Section 307/34 IPC.

¶12

Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he inflicted stab injury on the victim Subhit in presence of the complainant de facto Suraj.

¶13

BAIL APPLN. 2419/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2 KATHPALIA eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.03 17:32:00 +05'30'

¶14

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Da te:0 3.07.2026 17:42:18

¶15

Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Nitesh, accepts notice and in all fairness submits that the injured Subhit also now stands examined before the trial court, so State does not have serious objection to this application.

¶16

The co-accused Vimal, who allegedly caught hold of the victim has already been granted bail this Court vide judgment dated 02.04.2026. It appears that the injured Subhit was earlier not appearing before the trial court to record his testimony but now he has been examined. The injured Subhit was discharged from hospital after 12 days of the incident dated 29.05.2024 and the accused/applicant is in custody since 30.05.2024.

¶17

In above circumstances, this application is allowed and accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

¶18

A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.

¶19

GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶20

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cac ca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.03 17:32:19 +05'30'

¶21

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

¶22

JULY 03, 2026/ ry

¶23

BAIL APPLN. 2419/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages

¶24

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Da te:0 3.07.2026 17:42:18

Mukul @ Puneet v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukul @ Puneet v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Sharma Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Prayagraj Sharma Vs State of NCT of Dellhi & Anr.

Virender Singh Vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Gurpreet Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Laxmikant Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rajesh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.