registered. The accused/applicant claims that his only mistake is not having maintained the documentary record properly, for which he can be penalized under Section 28A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The investigation further revealed that the accused/applicant had purchased the allegedly recovered contraband from one Bijender, who also has been arrested and supplementary chargesheet has been filed in that regard. Today in the course of arguments, learned APP for State, on instructions of IO/SI Pardeep, submits that Bijender has disclosed the names of the manufacturers of the contraband from whom he had obtained the same. It is also disclosed by the IO that those manufacturers have sent some replies, which are being examined. It is further investigation on those lines that is pending and a second supplementary chargesheet shall be filed according to the IO within one month. That being so, it appears to learned counsel for accused/applicant that the said further investigation might reveal the documentary trail of sale-purchase of the allegedly recovered contraband. It is for this reason that the accused/applicant through his counsel has instructed the learned senior counsel to seek withdrawal of this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court after the second supplementary chargesheet is filed. However, if for some reason, the second supplementary chargesheet is not filed within one month, the accused/applicant shall be at liberty to file fresh bail application before the trial court.
