Regular bail application by an accused charged under Section 103(1) BNS and Arms Act for shooting dead the deceased. Court noted eyewitness statements and CCTV footage despite trial witnesses not supporting prosecution, held no ground for bail was made out, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~81
Through: Mr. Aman Deep Sorout, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State. Insp. Rishikesh, PS Fatehpur Beri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
O R D E R
% 21.07.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:04:22
Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CrPC’ ). He further submits that the other material witnesses regarding the recovery of the weapon of offence, i.e., the pistol, are yet to be examined.
MADHU JAIN, J
JULY 21, 2026/b/rm
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:04:22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused in a Section 103(1) BNS murder case should be released on regular bail where material witnesses turned hostile but recovery witnesses remain to be examined.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Piyush
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
