The High Court of Delhi quashed a writ petition by the petitioner after the respondent deposited the demanded amount and the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition on that basis.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn after respondent deposited the amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
CNR No. DLHC010305382026
PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ginny Jetley Rautray and Mr. Arnav Tandon, Advocates.
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with Ms. Harshita Kotru, Advocate. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Easha Gurang, JSC for Revenue.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 07.09.2026
DINESH MEHTA, J.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 7, 2026/ nd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:56:53
PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
Dinesh Mehta
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
