This order in three writ petitions dismissed the Petitions due to default caused by the non-appearance of the Petitioner over many hearing dates.
dismissal of the petition in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
CNR No. DLHC010090202018
versus
PRAKASH NEGI .....Respondent
Through: None
versus
NAVNEET KUMAR .....Respondent
Through: None
versus
SANTOSH KUMAR .....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 06.08.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/08/2026 at 11:50:02
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
AUGUST 6, 2026 sn
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/08/2026 at 11:50:02
M/S Contentra Technology India (P) Ltd
Prakash Negi
Navneet Kumar
Santosh Kumar
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
