Upasana Kumari & Anr. v. Indian Institute of Mass Communication & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous petition disposed of. Upasana Kumari & Anr. v. Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC) & Anr. (incl. UOI as R-2). W.P.(C) 7094/2026; CM APPL. 34748/2026; High Court of Delhi; Jasmeet Singh, J.; decision date 22.07.2026. Single-paragraph order disposing of the petition as infructuous on counsel's statement; no statutory references, no precedent citations, no quantum. Petitioner counsel: Kumar Abhishek, Amit Dwivedi, Anamika Mishra, Kunal Karan, Gaurav Yadav, Shubham Prateek Singh. Respondent counsel: Om Prakash, Chandresh Pratap, Swati Mishra, Prince Yadav, Ankita Yadav; Niraj Kumar (Sr. Central Govt. Counsel), Lavanya Kaushik (G.P.), Khyaati Bansal, Chaitanya Kumar for R-2/UOI.
What did the court decide?
On learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the petition had become infructuous, the Court disposed of the petition.