Disposed¶14

Gti Infotel Private Limited v. 1. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC19 May 2026W.P.(C)/6760/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

GTI Infotel Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.; High Court of Delhi; W.P.(C) 6760/2026; CM APPL. 33237/2026; order dated 19.05.2026; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; order of suspension; reconsideration; opportunity of hearing; personal hearing; detailed representation within one week; additional issues and documents; appropriate order in accordance with law; petition disposed of; rights and contentions left open.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued: petitioner to file a detailed representation to respondent no.2 within one week (with liberty to take additional issues and enclose additional documents); respondent no.2 to extend an opportunity of personal hearing and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law; all rights and contentions left open. ¶14

Gti Infotel Private Limited Vs 1. Union of India & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether directions should be issued to respondent no.2 to reconsider the order of suspension after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

¶8

Court's answer

The petitioner was directed to file a detailed representation to respondent no.2 within one week, with liberty to take additional issues not taken in the earlier hearing and to enclose additional documents.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

If the petitioner files such representation, respondent no.2 shall extend the opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or its representative and thereafter pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

¶13

Key takeaways

With the aforesaid directions, the petition along with the pending application stands disposed of.ratio¶14
All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.obiter¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

W.P.(C) 6760/2026 and CM APPL. 33237/2026 — GTI Infotel Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors. (High Court of Delhi, Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J., order dated 19.05.2026): The petitioner sought directions to respondent no.2 to reconsider its order of suspension after affording an opportunity of hearing. Counsel for respondent no.2 stated that a hearing opportunity had already been extended and that any additional material would be considered. The Court directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation to respondent no.2 within one week, with liberty to take additional issues not previously raised and to enclose additional documents; upon such filing, respondent no.2 was to extend an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or its representative and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. The petition and the pending application stand disposed of, with all rights and contentions left open.

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6760/2026 and CM APPL. 33237/2026 GTI INFOTEL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr Ashish Mohan Sr Advocate with Mr Dhruv Tamta, Mr Auritro Mukherjee, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar, CGSC with. Mr. Nipun Jain, GP, Ms. Aditi Bhatt, Ms. Astha Prasad with Mr. Dinesh Vishwakarma, Advocates for R-1/ UOI. Ms. Shweta Bharti, Mr. Avdhesh Bairwa, Ms. Sanjana Sachdev, Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Amit Meharia, Ms. Tannishtha Singh and Mr. Sambhav, Advocates for R-3.

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶7

O R D E R % 19.05.2026

¶8

On 15.05.2026, the submission of Mr. Mohan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner was noted by the Court, who contended that the directions be issued to respondent no.2 to reconsider the order of suspension after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 17:06:55

¶11

Learned counsel who appears for respondent no.2, on instructions, submits that the opportunity of hearing was already extended to the petitioner. However, if the petitioner has any additional material, they are open to reconsider the same.

¶12

In view of the aforesaid, let the petitioner to file a detailed representation to respondent no.2 within one (1) week from today. The petitioner is granted liberty to take additional issues which it might not have taken in earlier hearing. The petitioner shall also be at liberty to enclose additional documents, if any.

¶13

If the petitioner does so, let respondent no.2 to extend the opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or to its representative. Respondent no.2, thereafter, shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid directions, the petition, along with pending application, stands disposed of.

¶15

All rights contentions are left open.

¶16

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶17

MAY 19, 2026 aks

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 17:06:55

Gti Infotel Private Limited v. 1. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gti Infotel Private Limited v. 1. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheik Aktar Hosen Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dr. Xxxxxxxx & Anr. Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Ex Nk Mohan Singh

Subhash Chand Garg Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.

Jyoti Kesri Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Anil Yadav & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Dhruv Goel & Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sv Chak & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr. Xxxxxxxx & Anr. Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Master Adwait Haritas through His Father and Natural Guardian Mr Vivek Sharma Vs Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Ors.

Shri Krishan Grit Co. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Kamlesh Singh and Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi Ors.

Ajay Yadav Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

Smt Jyoti Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.