Disposed¶15

Shri Krishan Grit Co. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC18 May 2026W.P.(C)/1543/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(C) 1543/2026; Shri Krishan Grit Co v. Union of India & Ors.; High Court of Delhi at New Delhi; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; decided 18.05.2026; MSEFC claim application; delayed payments INR 21,09,54,280.73/-; writ of mandamus; petition disposed of; application directed to be processed by SDM (Headquarters), Central District, Delhi; liberty to file fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

None of the sought writ reliefs was adjudicated; petition disposed of with a direction that the petitioner's application be processed by the SDM (Headquarters), Central District, Delhi without further delay, and liberty to file a fresh petition. ¶15

Shri Krishan Grit Co. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1543/2026

¶4

SHRI KRISHAN GRIT CO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Areeb Amanullah, Ms. Meherunnisa Anand Jaitley, Mr. Kapil Rustagi and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Nandini Aggarwal and Ms. Samiksha, Advs. for R-1.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 18.05.2026

¶7

The petition is filed for the following reliefs:

¶8

“1. Issue an appropriate Writ, Order and/or Direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order, and/or Direction of like nature to the Respondent No. 1 for registering the Claim Application of the Petitioner for delayed payments amounting to INR 21,09,54,280.73/- (Rupees Twenty One Crores Nine Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Two Hundred Eighty and Seventy-Three Paise Only) in a time-bound manner, by accepting the same in physical form through the Respondent No. 2/ concerned MSEFC falling within the aegis of Respondent No. 3;

¶9

2. Issue an appropriate Writ, Order and/or Direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order, and/or Direction of like nature to the Respondent No. 1 for forwarding the Claim Application of the Petitioner for delayed payments amounting to INR 21,09,54,280.73/- (Rupees Twenty One Crores Nine Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Two Hundred Eighty and Seventy-Three Paise Only) to the Respondent No. 2/ concerned MSEFC for further action and processing, subsequent to the registration of Claim of the Petitioner having been facilitated by the Respondent No. 1;

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 17:13:55

¶12

3. Pass such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the best interest of justice, equity and good conscience.”

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that today, he has received a message whereby he has been given to understand that his application shall be processed by the Registry.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application stands disposed of, however, it is directed that the petitioner’s application be processed by the SDM (Headquarters), Central District, Delhi and be taken to its logical conclusion without any further delay.

¶15

With these observations, petition stands disposed of.

¶16

Liberty is granted to file a fresh petition, if the occasion so arises.

¶17

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶18

MAY 18, 2026/P

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 17:13:55

Shri Krishan Grit Co. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Krishan Grit Co. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.C.Jain & Ors. Vs Vice Chancellor, Delhi Univers

M.R.Giri Vs Registrar National Museum Inst

Tapash Datta Vs Indian Oil Corporation

Dr Virender Baboria Vs Union of India and Anr.

Kamlesh Singh and Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi Ors.

Gti Infotel Private Limited Vs 1. Union of India & Ors.

Neena Bhasin Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vasi Vs Muncipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Harmandeep Singh Kandhari Vs Bureau of Immigration & Ors.

Subramaniam Mahindan Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vipin Kumar Tyagi Vs UOI and Ors.

Kamal Bedi Vs Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.

M/S. Pratibha Mosinzhstroi Consortium Vs National Commission for Scheduled Castes & Ors.

Priya Jeanne Strome Iyer & Anr. Vs Union of India