Mohinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Delhi HC21 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/643/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Part-time Punjabi teachers; parity with Avtar Singh petitioners; refixation of salary; Punjabi Academy; undertaking academic year 2025–26; disposal in terms of Avtar Singh (2025:DHC:5596); directions subject to LPA 29/2026; W.P.(C) 582/2026 and connected matters; Delhi High Court; Sanjeev Narula, J.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners extended the same reliefs as in Avtar Singh & Ors. (including refixation of salaries per that judgment), subject to the outcome of the pending LPA 29/2026; any undertaking sought from the Petitioners shall not dilute the Avtar Singh directions. ¶¶21

Mohinder Kaur Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~5 to 11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 582/2026 LALITA RANI .....Petitioner

¶4

versus

¶5

PUNJABI ACADEMY & ORS. .....Respondents

¶6

With

¶7

W.P.(C) 641/2026, W.P.(C) 642/2026, W.P.(C) 643/2026, W.P.(C) 644/2026, W.P.(C) 645/2026 & W.P.(C) 650/2026.

¶8

For Petitioner:

¶9

For Respondents: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr. Manish Gusai, Ms. Aliza Alam & Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Dr. Divya Swamy, SC with Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Mr. Anubhav Agrawal, Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Ms. Nidhi Kumar, Ms. Akriti Singh, Ms. Ananya & Mr. Sikhar, Advocates for MCD.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶12

O R D E R % 21.01.2026

¶13

The Petitioners submit that they were engaged as part-time teachers for teaching Punjabi and have been continuously working for over 15 years. They claim parity with similarly situated petitioners who had approached this Court in W.P.(C) 3675/2017 and connected matters, and seek appropriate directions in that regard.

¶14

It is also pointed out that the Punjabi Academy has now started insisting upon an undertaking for the academic year 2025–26, and that

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:38:55

¶17

furnishing such undertaking may prejudice the Petitioners’ entitlement to the benefits already extended by this Court to similarly placed petitioners in ‘Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.’ .¹ Accordingly, a prayer is also made that the Respondents be restrained from insisting on the undertaking referred to in paragraph 12 of the petition.

¶18

The Court has heard the counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that the Petitioners are similarly situated to the petitioners in Avtar Singh & Ors . , wherein this Court has already directed the Respondents to refix the salaries of the petitioners.

¶19

The Court is informed that the aforesaid judgment is under challenge in LPA 29/2026 , wherein notice has been issued on the application seeking condonation of delay.

¶20

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the direction issued in Avtar Singh & Ors. The Petitioners shall be entitle to similar reliefs. Since the said judgment is pending challenge in appeal, the directions herein shall remain subject to the outcome of the pending LPA. It is further clarified that any undertaking sought to be obtained from the Petitioners by the Respondents shall not dilute the directions issued by this Court in Avtar Singh & Ors . , which stand extended to the present Petitioners.

¶21

With the above directions, the present petitions are disposed of.

¶22

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶23

JANUARY 21, 2026/ hc

¶24

1 2025: DHC : 5596.

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:38:55

Mohinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Singh Vs Nclt Registrar & Ors.

Shaheeda Begum Qureshi & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi College of Engineering, Technical Staff Association (Regd.) Vs Delhi Technological University & Ors.

Venkatachalam Thangavelu Vs Ito, Ward 70(1), Delhi

Kishore Kr Singh Rana and Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Mahila Hawker Welfare Association Vs District Magistrate, Shahdra & Ors.

Brajendra Singh Mann Vs Dy Conservator of Forest and Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs 89760 Z Cdr Ns Dhami

Mr. Madan Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

United Doctors Front (Udf) Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Subhash Chandra Alais Subhash Chandra Gautam Vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

Veena Rani Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Satish Lohia Vs Secretary (Revenue)Divisional Commissioner & Ors.

Parvinder Kaur Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors.