Disposed¶6

Parvinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Delhi HC21 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/641/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC writ petitions by long-serving part-time Punjabi teachers seeking pay parity with Avtar Singh petitioners; disposed of in terms of Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Punjabi Academy & Ors. (2025:DHC:5596) directions to refix salaries; reliefs extended but subject to pending LPA 29/2026 appeal; undertaking demand by Punjabi Academy for AY 2025–26 clarified as incapable of diluting extended directions.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of in terms of the directions in Avtar Singh & Ors.; Petitioners entitled to similar reliefs (salary refixation parity), subject to the outcome of pending LPA 29/2026; any undertaking demanded shall not dilute the extended directions. ¶6

Parvinder Kaur Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶6

Issue for consideration

Whether the Petitioners, engaged as part-time Punjabi teachers continuously working for over 15 years, are entitled to parity with the similarly situated petitioners in W.P.(C) 3675/2017 and connected matters, and to appropriate directions accordingly. +1 more

¶1

Court's answer

It is not in dispute that the Petitioners are similarly situated to the petitioners in Avtar Singh & Ors., in which case this Court had already directed the Respondents to refix the salaries of the petitioners.

¶3

Ratio / Principle

The present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the direction issued in Avtar Singh & Ors.; the Petitioners shall be entitled to similar reliefs.

¶5

Key takeaways

Because the Avtar Singh judgment is under challenge in appeal (LPA 29/2026), the directions issued herein shall remain subject to the outcome of the pending LPA.ratio¶5
It is clarified that any undertaking sought from the Petitioners shall not dilute the directions issued in Avtar Singh & Ors., which stand extended to the present Petitioners.ratio¶5

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Sanjeev Narula, J) disposed of W.P.(C) 582/2026 and connected writ petitions filed by part-time Punjabi teachers with over 15 years of continuous service, who claimed parity with similarly situated petitioners in W.P.(C) 3675/2017 and connected matters. Finding the position undisputed, the Court disposed of the petitions in terms of the directions in Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Punjabi Academy & Ors. (2025:DHC:5596), whereby the Respondents had been directed to refix salaries, and held the Petitioners entitled to similar reliefs. Since that judgment is under challenge in LPA 29/2026 (notice issued on condonation-of-delay application), the directions were expressly made subject to the outcome of the pending appeal. The Court further clarified that any undertaking sought by the Respondents (insisted upon for academic year 2025–26) shall not dilute the Avtar Singh directions, which stand extended to the present Petitioners.

¶1

$~5 to 11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 582/2026 LALITA RANI .....Petitioner

¶4

versus

¶5

PUNJABI ACADEMY & ORS. .....Respondents

¶6

With

¶7

W.P.(C) 641/2026, W.P.(C) 642/2026, W.P.(C) 643/2026, W.P.(C) 644/2026, W.P.(C) 645/2026 & W.P.(C) 650/2026.

¶8

For Petitioner:

¶9

For Respondents: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr. Manish Gusai, Ms. Aliza Alam & Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Dr. Divya Swamy, SC with Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Mr. Anubhav Agrawal, Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Ms. Nidhi Kumar, Ms. Akriti Singh, Ms. Ananya & Mr. Sikhar, Advocates for MCD.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶12

O R D E R % 21.01.2026

¶13

The Petitioners submit that they were engaged as part-time teachers for teaching Punjabi and have been continuously working for over 15 years. They claim parity with similarly situated petitioners who had approached this Court in W.P.(C) 3675/2017 and connected matters, and seek appropriate directions in that regard.

¶14

It is also pointed out that the Punjabi Academy has now started insisting upon an undertaking for the academic year 2025–26, and that

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:38:51

¶17

furnishing such undertaking may prejudice the Petitioners’ entitlement to the benefits already extended by this Court to similarly placed petitioners in ‘Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.’ .¹ Accordingly, a prayer is also made that the Respondents be restrained from insisting on the undertaking referred to in paragraph 12 of the petition.

¶18

The Court has heard the counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that the Petitioners are similarly situated to the petitioners in Avtar Singh & Ors . , wherein this Court has already directed the Respondents to refix the salaries of the petitioners.

¶19

The Court is informed that the aforesaid judgment is under challenge in LPA 29/2026 , wherein notice has been issued on the application seeking condonation of delay.

¶20

In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the direction issued in Avtar Singh & Ors. The Petitioners shall be entitle to similar reliefs. Since the said judgment is pending challenge in appeal, the directions herein shall remain subject to the outcome of the pending LPA. It is further clarified that any undertaking sought to be obtained from the Petitioners by the Respondents shall not dilute the directions issued by this Court in Avtar Singh & Ors . , which stand extended to the present Petitioners.

¶21

With the above directions, the present petitions are disposed of.

¶22

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶23

JANUARY 21, 2026/ hc

¶24

1 2025: DHC : 5596.

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2026 at 12:38:51

Parvinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvinder Kaur v. Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Singh Vs Nclt Registrar & Ors.

Shaheeda Begum Qureshi & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi College of Engineering, Technical Staff Association (Regd.) Vs Delhi Technological University & Ors.

Venkatachalam Thangavelu Vs Ito, Ward 70(1), Delhi

Union of India & Ors. Vs Brig. Surya Deo Prasad

Kamal Educational and Welfare Society Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner

Shaida Vs the Commissioner of MCD & Ors.

Mr Adarsh Pal Singh Randhawa Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mr. Madan Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

United Doctors Front (Udf) Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Subhash Chandra Alais Subhash Chandra Gautam Vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

Kanwaljit Kaur Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors.

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Garg & Anr. Vs Gnctd & Ors.

Lalita Rani Vs Punjabi Academy & Ors.