Petitioner sought withdrawal of its writ petition in view of the availability of statutory remedy. The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, clarifying that it had not considered the merits and that any revision preferred would be dealt with in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
M/S SHREE GANESH CEMENTECH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kasana, Mr. Chirag Verma, and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX CGST DELHI WEST COMMISSIONERATE AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Monica Benjamin, SSC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R % 11.05.2026
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
MAY 11, 2026/ ay/ok
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:50:58
M/S Shree Ganesh Cementech
Commissioner of Central Tax CGST Delhi West Commissionerate
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
