Disposed¶22

Uthamaraja M v. Union of India

Delhi HC5 May 2026W.P.(C)/6110/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC, 05.05.2026, W.P.(C) 6076/2026 & 6110/2026 (coram: Anil Kshetarpal & Amit Mahajan, JJ.): petitions by CISF Constable (GD) selectees Avishek Nunia & Anr. and Uthamaraja M seeking direction to Standing Screening Committee to verify no-FIR antecedent documents; writ petitions disposed of with direction to SSC to act within six weeks; obiter observation on administrative inefficiency encouraging litigation; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Standing Screening Committee (SSC) of CISF to examine and consider the documents produced by the Petitioners expeditiously within six (06) weeks from the date of the order. ¶22

Uthamaraja M Vs Union of India — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~44 and 51

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6076/2026 and CM APPL. 29946/2026 AVISHEK NUNIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh,Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Sourabh Soni and Mr. Shobhit Anand, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, SPC along with Mr. Sarthak Rana, GP.

¶6

(51)

¶7

W.P.(C) 6110/2026 and CM APPL. 30014/2026 UTHAMARAJA M .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh,Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Sourabh Soni and Mr. Shobhit Anand, Advs.

¶8

versus

¶9

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, SPC along with Mr. Sarthak Rana, GP.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

% 05.05.2026

¶14

This order shall dispose of the above-captioned two (02) Writ Petitions, wherein identical reliefs have been sought.

¶15

For ready reference, the prayer made in W.P.(C) 6076/2026 is reproduced as under:

¶16

“ A direction to the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi to decide the correctness and antecedents of the documents produced by the Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2, showing proof in support of the fact that no case/FIR is pending against them, within two weeks, as no cases

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:57:04

¶19

whatsoever are pending against the Petitioners herein ”

¶20

As is evident, the only prayer made by the Petitioners is for a direction to the Standing Screening Committee („SSC‟) of the Central Industrial Security Force („CISF‟) at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi, to examine the correctness and antecedents of the documents produced by the Petitioners within a period of two (02) weeks.

¶21

The Petitioners, who have been selected as Constable (GD), cannot be made to wait endlessly on such a pretext.

¶22

Accordingly, the present Writ Petitions stand disposed of with a direction to the SSC to examine and consider the documents expeditiously within a period of six (06) weeks from today.

¶23

Further, this Court is constrained to observe that unnecessary litigation is being encouraged on account of administrative inefficiencies on the part of the Respondents, which ought to be avoided.

¶24

A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matter.

¶25

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶26

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

¶27

MAY 05, 2026 s.godara/pal

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:57:04

Uthamaraja M v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uthamaraja M v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shridhar Vyas and Ors. Vs National Board of Examination in Medical Science and Ors.

Insp/Exe Ranbir Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jugal Pratap Vs Delhi Skill and Enterpreneurship University & Ors.

Mohd Dilshad Vs Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board & Ors.

Technopak Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nabard Consultancy Services Private Limited & Anr.

Jay Bajarangbali Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training

University Grants Commission & Anr. Vs Rajesh Anand & Anr.

Ravi Chilkuri Vs Union of India & Ors.

Interlink Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. (Nafed) & Ors.

Braham Prakash Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Jai Bhagwan Vs Union of India and Ors.

Matsya Fincap Pvt. Ltd. Vs Govind Lal

Campos Brothers Farms Vs Matru Bhumi Supply Chain Pvt. Limited & Ors.