Disposed¶19

Samay Ji H.A. Mahavidyalaya v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Delhi HC5 May 2026W.P.(C)/6081/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Samay Ji H.A. Mahavidyalaya v. National Council for Teacher Education; W.P.(C) 6081/2026; Delhi High Court; Article 226 writ petition; NCTE Regulations 2014; NCTE Act; revised recognition; 100 seats B.Ed. course; representation pending with NRC/respondent No. 1; parity with W.P.(C) 5765/2025 order dated 16.05.2025; direction to decide within 8 weeks; academic session 2026-27 counselling and admissions; order disposed 05.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to decide the petitioner's request for issuance of revised recognition for 100 seats expeditiously, preferably within 8 weeks; petition disposed of in those terms. ¶19

Samay Ji H.A. Mahavidyalaya Vs National Council for… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~78

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 6081/2026

¶4

SAMAY JI H.A. MAHAVIDYALAYA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. versus

¶5

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 05.05.2026

¶7

CM APPL. 29953/2026

¶8

Exemptions granted, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application is disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(C) 6081/2026

¶11

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:-

¶12

“(i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to issue revised recognition order for 100 Seats of B.Ed. Course to the Petitioner institution under NCTE Regulations, 2014; and/or (ii) issue direction/order holding that the recognition granted to the petitioner for B.Ed. course continues to be in operation under the NCTE Act and the petitioner be treated as a recognized institution for all purposes and the respondents be directed to take all consequential steps including correcting

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 13:08:32

¶15

the status of petitioner institution as a recognized institution on their 21 website and to inform the affiliating body and the Department of Higher Education, Government of Uttar Pradesh enabling the petitioner to conduct the B.Ed. Course as well as participate in counselling & admit students for the academic session 2026-27 and onwards. ...”

¶16

The facts are that the petitioner submitted documents in the prescribed proforma to NRC for compliance of NCTE Regulations, 2014 seeking revised recognition for 100 seats. The said representation is pending consideration by the respondent No. 1.

¶17

My attention has been drawn to an Order dated 16.05.2025 in W.P(C) 5765/2025 wherein in somewhat similar circumstances the coordinate bench allowed the petition directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly, on the basis of parity, it is directed that the respondent shall decide the request of the petitioner institution for issuance of revised recognition of petitioner institution for 100 seats expeditiously and preferably within 8 weeks from today.

¶19

The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶20

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶21

MAY 5, 2026/AS

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/05/2026 at 13:08:32

Samay Ji H.A. Mahavidyalaya v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Samay Ji H.A. Mahavidyalaya v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shridhar Vyas and Ors. Vs National Board of Examination in Medical Science and Ors.

Insp/Exe Ranbir Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jugal Pratap Vs Delhi Skill and Enterpreneurship University & Ors.

Mohd Dilshad Vs Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board & Ors.

Technopak Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nabard Consultancy Services Private Limited & Anr.

Jay Bajarangbali Private Iti Vs Directorate General of Training

University Grants Commission & Anr. Vs Rajesh Anand & Anr.

Ravi Chilkuri Vs Union of India & Ors.

Shridhar Vyas and Ors. Vs National Board of Examination in Medical Science and Ors.

Jugal Pratap Vs Delhi Skill and Enterpreneurship University & Ors.

Mazin C P and Ors. Vs National Board of Examination in Medical Science and Ors.

Devanshu Mishra Vs University of Delhi through Its Vice-Chancellor & Ors.

Shayan Amir Vs Cbse & Ors.

Amity International School and Anr. Vs the Director, Directorate of Education and Anr.