Rajarshi Goswami v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed after counsel stated she had no instructions from the petitioner; the court disposed of it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
RAJARSHI GOSWAMI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pooja Giri, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Avni Singh (Panel CounselGNCTD) with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 23.04.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
APRIL 23, 2026/SH
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 14:05:20
Rajarshi Goswami
Union of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court