Counsel appearing for the petitioners informed the Court that she had no instructions to continue in the matter. On that statement, the Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
KRISHAN CHAND GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Counsel (appearance not given)
versus
OFFICE OF THE LT.GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr Kartik Sharma, Adv. for Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Adv. for R1. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCD. Mr. Manish Vashishtha, Ms. Sonal Awasthi, Advocates for R3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 22.04.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
APRIL 22, 2026 tr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:33:02
KRISHAN CHAND GUPTA
OFFICE OF THE LT.GOVERNOR OF DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
