Correction order in two writ petitions: appearance of counsel for respondent no.3 (Supreme Court of India) was omitted from the judgment dated 16.03.2026 by inadvertent error; the court directed the judgment be deleted from the website and re-uploaded with the counsel's appearance marked.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~92 and 93
Through: Ms. Nidhi Ramam CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra, Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Anil Kaushik ASG along with Mr Pranjal Singh, Advocates for respondent no. 3. . 93 + W.P.(C) 5301/2024 KAVITA CHOPRA .....Petitioner Through: None versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Kaushik ASG along with Mr Pranjal Singh, Advocates for respondent no. 3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 25.03.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:02:01
Pranjal Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3, who states that due to an inadvertent error, appearance on behalf of respondent no.3 could not be marked in the judgment dated 16.03.2026.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MARCH 25, 2026 ar
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 13:02:01
M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Land Development Office and Ors.
Kavita Chopra
Union of India and Ors.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
