Writ petition disposed of after the Court observed the petitioners had not undertaken the grievance mechanism under the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, and granted them liberty to do so, with their grievance to be dealt with in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
MR. R AND ANR .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Manish Kashyap, Mr. Shivender Gupta, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Roop Chand, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Mr. Ankit Khatri, Ms.Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 19.03.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 13:13:59
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MARCH 19, 2026 Nc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 13:13:59
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR. R AND ANR
UNION OF INDIA
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
