Writ petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition; the bench dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application. No substantive adjudication occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: Ms. Mishika Gupta, Mr. Gagan Mathur, Mr. Varun Kumar, and Mr. Rajnish Jindal, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: appearance not given
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MARCH 18, 2026/ msh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2026 at 13:34:43
Arun Sharma
Union of India
V. Kameswar Rao
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
