Al Saad Traders through Its Proprietor Anash v. Commisisoner of Central Tax & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 341/2026 with CM APPL. 1667/2026 and CM APPL. 1666/2026; order dated 02.02.2026 (signed February 2, 2026); coram Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul, JJ. Petitioner: Al Saad Traders through its proprietor Anash (counsel: M. A. Ansari, Tabbasum Firdause, Mohd. Imran, Ahmad Ansari). Respondents: Commissioner of Central Tax & Ors. (as printed: 'COMMISISONER OF CENTRAL TAX & ORS.') represented by Samiksha Godiyal, SSC, CBIC with Tenzing Namgyal Bhutia and Rithwik Narayanan. Keywords: alternate and efficacious remedy; maintainability of writ petition; statutory pre-deposit of 10% of liability at time of filing of appeal; financial inability; appellate remedy not infructuous; petition disposed of with pending applications; liberty to file appeal. No statutes or precedents cited; no monetary quantum stated; identity of impugned order/forum/date not stated in the text.