Disposed¶18

Rwa Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Delhi HC3 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/1476/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 1476/2026, RWA Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, order dated 03.02.2026 by Justice Amit Bansal; unauthorised construction, demolition direction, work stop order, plot No. B-86A, Khasra No.31/7/2, Bharat Vihar, Kakrola, Dwarka, SHO PS Sector-17; petition disposed of with liberty and owner/occupier rights protected.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SHO, PS: Sector-17, Dwarka, New Delhi to act in terms of the work stop order dated 02.02.2026; petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies available in law for any further grievance; rights of the owner/occupier protected. ¶18

Rwa Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1476/2026

¶4

RWA DWARKA PUNARWAS COLONY (REGD.) .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Binisha Mohanty, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for MCD. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Antara Mishra, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶8

O R D E R % 03.02.2026

¶9

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent/MCD to demolish and prevent unauthorised cutting taking place at plot No. B-86A, Khasra No.31/7/2, Bharat Vihar, Kakrola, New Delhi .

¶10

It is stated that the unauthorised construction is going on at the outskirts of the colony of the petitioner society and in the nearby area, facing the petitioner society. If the unauthorised construction is continued, then the common road of the petitioner society will be affected and unnecessarily crowded. The same shall create a hindrance in the traffic management and parking problem on the road of the petitioner society.

¶11

Along with the petition, the petitioner has placed on record photographs to show the construction being carried out at subject plot. 4. Mr. Kapil Dutta appearing on behalf of the respondent/MCD submits

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

W.P.(C) 1476/2026

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:05:26

¶15

that the aforesaid property has been inspected on 2^nd February, 2026 and the construction was found to be at a very initial stage. A work stop order has also been issued on 2^nd February 2026 to SHO, PS: Sector-17, Dwarka, New Delhi

¶16

A copy of the aforesaid work stop order has been handed over in Court and the same is taken on record.

¶17

Accordingly, the SHO, PS: Sector-17, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to act in terms of the aforesaid work stop order.

¶18

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.

¶19

In the event the petitioner has any further grievance, the petitioner would be free to avail the remedies as available in law.

¶20

All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier shall remain protected.

¶21

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶22

FEBRUARY 3, 2026 ds

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

W.P.(C) 1476/2026

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:05:26

Rwa Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rwa Dwarka Punarwas Colony (Regd.) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kant Attri and Ors. Vs Registrar of Societies and Ors.

Meghna Rajendra Kumar Mangla Vs Union of India and Ors.

Jyoti Vs Telugu Primary School & Ors.

Hari Rajmanikkam (President of Proposed Political Party Bhartiya Dravida Janatha Party Approved Nam Vs Election Commission of India

Pankaj Kumar Vs Special Task Force and Others

Paardarshita Public Welfaqre Foundation (Ngo) Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Sunita Rani Vs Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Arun Baban Sawant Vs Union of India

Meghna Rajendra Kumar Mangla Vs Union of India and Ors.

Hari Rajmanikkam (President of Proposed Political Party Bhartiya Dravida Janatha Party Approved Nam Vs Election Commission of India

Mohd Jameel Vs the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Mohd. Javed Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Abdul Khaliq Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Riju Jain and Anr. Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. and Ors.