Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner due to technical defects; court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and dismissed the petition.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~82
VIVEK UTPAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Tejasvi Kumar, Advocate.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Advocate for R-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R 16.03.2026
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MARCH 16, 2026
as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2026 at 16:24:17
Vivek Utpal
Union of India & Ors.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
