M/S Goyala Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/4601/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court writ petition; mandamus; renewal of enlistment in list of contractors; inclusion of name in contractors' list; order rejecting technical bid; listed contractor as pre-condition; enlistment application dated 16.03.2026; consideration within six weeks; entitlement not examined; Goyala Infra Projects v Union of India.

What did the court decide?

Respondents requested to consider the Petitioner's application for enlistment expeditiously and preferably within a period of next six weeks, without any adjudication of entitlement. ¶¶19

M/S Goyala Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~76

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4601/2026

¶4

M/S GOYALA INFRA PROJECTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Bansal, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain CGSC with Mr Kautilya Birat, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 08.04.2026

¶8

CM APPL. 22473/2026 & CM APPL. 22474/2026 [ Exemptions ]

¶9

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

Applications stand disposed of.

¶11

W.P.(C) 4601/2026

¶12

By the present writ petition, the Petitioner herein prays for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to renew the Petitioner’s enlistment in the list of contractors. The Petitioner also prays for setting aside the order rejecting its technical bid as the Petitioner is not a listed contractor.

¶13

The learned counsel representing the Petitioner admits that the second prayer made in the present writ petition cannot be granted because the Petitioner was not and is not a listed contractor, which is one of the pre-conditions.

¶14

The learned counsel representing the Petitioner consequently

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:21:49

¶17

restricts his prayer to the inclusion of the Petitioner’s name in the list of contractors. The Petitioner is stated to have submitted an application in this regard on 16.03.2026.

¶18

The learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

¶19

Keeping in view the limited prayer made in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of while requesting the Respondents to consider the Petitioner’s application for enlistment expeditiously and preferably within a period of next six weeks.

¶20

It is made clear that this Court has not examined the entitlement of the Petitioner and the Respondents shall be free to pass appropriate order(s) in accordance with law.

¶21

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J

¶22

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶23

APRIL 8, 2026 DU

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:21:49

M/S Goyala Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Goyala Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baby Tanvi Yadav through Her Guardian Sushil Yadav (Father) Vs Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Nb Sub Ramakant Singh Vs Union of India

Carreg Commodities Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.

Ms Saloni Breja Proprietor of Ms Galaxy World Vs Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi North and Anr.

Master Tanishq Negi through Her Mother Vs Union of India & Ors.

Baby Ishita Yadav through Her Father Vs Union of India & Ors.

Virender Kumar Tyagi Vs Union of India & Ors.

Amar Jeet & Ors. Vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Manish Kumar Gupta Vs Director General Coast Guard and Ors.

Ms Sahaj Solar Limited Vs Border Security Force & Ors.

Smt Poonam Kishan Vs Union of India Ministry of Defense & Anr.

Nikhil Soni Vs Sh Mohak Wadhera & Anr.

Sunil Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs Pawan Gupta (Huf)