Sumit Agarwal v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court order dated 11.03.2026 in W.P.(C) 3090/2026 & CMAPPL.14915/2026, Sumit Agarwal v. Canara Bank; coram Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Renu Bhatnagar. Writ petition under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 against the judgment dated 15.10.2025 of the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, New Delhi in Appeal No.21/2024 (Shri Sumit Agarwal & Anr. v. Canara Bank) dismissing the petitioner's appeal; petitioner's Appeal No. 2394/2025 before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) pending. Petition disposed of; petitioner permitted to move urgency application before the DRAT, to be decided expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to move an appropriate urgency application before the concerned DRAT, with the Court expecting the DRAT to consider and decide it expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments; the writ petition along with pending applications, if any, disposed of.