Hakiman v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing or on the two preceding dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
.....Petitioner
Through: None. versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Vidushi Singhania, Adv. for Kritika Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for MCD Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms. Yashita Jain, Advs. for DUSIB
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:43:38
Hakiman
Government of NCT of Delhi
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court