Disposed¶28

Sourav Bansal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/262/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Unauthorised construction; demolition direction; Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD); SHO directed to stop further construction; demolition order dated 05.01.2026 with 15 days' time to respondent no.3; communication to SHO dated 19.12.2025; GRAP (Graded Response Action Plan); WZ5 Ramgarh Colony Basai Darapur New Delhi; Sourav Bansal v. MCD & Ors.; W.P.(C) 262/2026 & CM APPL. 1196/2026; Delhi High Court; Justice Amit Bansal; disposed on 09.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2/SHO to ensure no further construction at the subject property; MCD demolition order dated 5th January 2026 (giving respondent no.3 15 days' time) taken on record; writ petition disposed of in terms thereof. ¶28

Sourav Bansal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~31

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 262/2026 & CM APPL. 1196/2026

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gursimar Singh and Mr. Manan Wadhwa, Advocates.

¶5

SOURAV BANSAL

¶6

versus

¶7

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for R-1/MCD.

¶9

Ms. Apoorva Khosla, Advocate for R- 2.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

09.01.2026

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.1 to demolish the unauthorised construction going on at WZ5, Ramgarh Colony, Basai Darapur, New Delhi . A direction is also sought against the respondent no.2/SHO to ensure immediate stoppage of construction.

¶15

It is stated that both the petitioner and respondent no.3 reside in the same premises. The petitioner lives in the rear right side portion of the subject property and the respondent no.3 occupies the left portion of the said property.

¶16

It is stated by the petitioner that the unauthorised construction has been carried out even during the period when GRAP (Graded Response

¶17

W.P.(C) 262/2026

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 12:43:36

¶21

Action Plan) was imposed in Delhi.

¶22

Issue Notice.

¶23

Notice is accepted by counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no.1 and 2.

¶24

Counsel for the respondent no.1/MCD submits that a demolition order in respect of the unauthorised construction going on in the aforesaid property has been passed on 5^th January, 2026 and 15 days’ time has been given to the respondent no.3 to demolish the unauthorised construction, failing which action would be taken by the respondent no.1.

¶25

6.1. The aforesaid demolition order dated 5^th January 2026 has been handed over in Court and is taken on record.

¶26

Further, a communication has also been sent to the respondent no.2/SHO on 19^th December, 2025, directing them to ensure that no further construction takes place at the subject property.

¶27

The respondent no.2/SHO shall ensure that no further construction is carried out at the said property.

¶28

In terms of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶29

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶30

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶31

JANUARY 9, 2026 Vivek/-

¶32

W.P.(C) 262/2026

¶33

Page 2 of 2

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 12:43:36

Sourav Bansal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sourav Bansal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprises Limited (Acre) Vs Rekha Saxena & Ors.

Ruma Bt College & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Ram Lal and Sons HUF Vs Canara Bank & Anr.

Nand Leather Co. Vs the Value Added Tax Officer & Anr.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Shiv Charan and Ors.

Smt. Asha Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

S.P. Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mrs. Seema Bhasin Vs Ramakrishna Public School and Ors.

Smt Neelam Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Smt. Vibha Amit Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ajay Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Faisal Ali Vs MCD & Ors.

Shri Tushar Mehta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Jeet Singh Vs the Commissioner of MCD and Ors.